Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland .Chapter 12: Alice’s Evidence.

Alice jumps to the White Rabbit’s call into the stand.

She forgets that she has grown larger and knocks over the jury stand, then scrambles to put most of the jurors back. Alice claims to know “nothing whatever” about the tarts, that your King deems “very important.” The King is corrected by the White Rabbit, suggesting which he in fact means “unimportant.” The King agrees, muttering the text that is“important “unimportant” to himself.

The King interjects with Rule 42, which states, “All persons more than a mile high to go out of the court.” Everyone turns to Alice, who denies this woman is a mile high and accuses the King of fabricating the rule. The King replies that Rule 42 may be the oldest rule within the book, but Alice retorts that if it is the oldest rule in the book, it must be the very first rule. The King becomes quiet for a moment before calling for a verdict. The White Rabbit interrupts and declares that more evidence must be presented first. He presents a paper supposedly written by the Knave, though it isn’t written in the Knave’s handwriting. The Knave refutes the charge, explaining that there surely is no signature in the document. The King reasons that the Knave should have meant mischief because he failed to sign the note like an man that is honest. The court seems pleased by this reasoning, in addition to Queen concludes that the paper proves the Knave’s guilt. Alice demands to learn the poem on the paper. Although the poem appears to have no meaning, the King provides an explanation and calls for a verdict. The Queen demands that the sentence come before the verdict. Alice chaffs at this proposal and criticizes the Queen, who calls for Alice’s beheading. Alice has grown to her size that is full and away the playing cards because they fly upon her.

Alice suddenly wakes up and finds herself back on her behalf sister’s lap at the riverbank. She is told by her adventures to her sister who bids her go inside for tea. Alice traipses off, while her sister remains by the riverbank daydreaming. She envisions the characters from Alice’s adventures, but understands that when she is opened by her eyes the images will dissipate. She imagines that Alice will one grow older but retain her childlike spirit and recount her adventures to other children day.

The chapter title “Alice’s Evidence” refers both into the evidence that Alice gives throughout write a paper for me the trial, plus the evidence that she can control by waking up that she discovers that Wonderland is a dream. Alice realizes during the trial so it all “doesn’t matter a bit” what the jury records or perhaps the jury is upside down or right side up. None of this details or orientations in Wonderland have any bearing on a coherent or outcome that is meaningful. Alice’s growth through the trial mirrors her awareness that is growing of proven fact that Wonderland is an illusion. She starts to grow as soon as the Mad Hatter bites into his teacup, and she reaches height that is full the heated exchange with all the Queen when she points out that her antagonists are “nothing but a pack of cards!” Alice exposes Wonderland as an illusion along with her growth to full size is sold with her realization that she’s got a measure of control of the illusion. Once she realizes that Wonderland is a dream, she wakes up and shatters the illusion.

Alice fully grasps the nature that is nonsensical of as soon as the King interprets the Knave’s poem. Alice disputes the King’s tries to attach meaning into the nonsense words of this poem. Her criticisms are ironic, since throughout her travels she has continually attempted to add up regarding the situations that are various stories she has encountered. Alice finally understands the futility of trying in order to make meaning out of her adventures of Wonderland since every part of it really is completely incomprehensible. This message is meant not just for Alice however for the readers of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland as well. In the same way the court complies with all the King’s harebrained readings of the poem, Carroll sends a message to those that would make an effort to assign specific meanings to the events. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland actively resists definitive interpretation, which is the reason the diversity associated with the criticism written about the novella.

The final scene with Alice’s sister establishes narrative symmetry and changes the tone of Alice’s journey from harrowing quest to childhood fantasy.

The reintroduction of this calm scene at the riverbank allows the story to close since it began, transforming Wonderland into an isolated episode of fancy. Alice’s sister ends the novella by changing the tone of Alice’s story, discounting the nightmarish qualities and favoring a dreamy nostalgia for “the simple and loving heart of her childhood.” The sister’s interpretation reduces Alice’s experience of trauma and trivializes the journey very little more than a “strange tale” that Alice may eventually recount to her own children.

¿Te ha gustado la publicación?
[Total: 0    Average: 0/5]

Deja un comentario